Robert Greene describes the Law of Generational Myopia as the tendency of each generation to believe that the challenges they face are unique to their time and that they possess special insights that previous generations lack. This can lead to a lack of appreciation for the wisdom and experiences of older generations, resulting in a cycle of history repeating itself. Underlying this law are cognitive biases and sociocultural factors.

Several cognitive biases and logical fallacies contribute to this perception.

Availability heuristic. This cognitive bias leads people to judge the likelihood of events based on their availability in memory. Because people are most familiar with the challenges and issues of their own time, they may overestimate the uniqueness of their problems.

Anchoring. People tend to reference or anchor their judgments based on the first information they encounter. If they perceive their generation’s issues as unprecedented, they might anchor their perception on this initial belief.

Confirmation bias. People seek information that confirms their existing beliefs and ignore or downplay information that contradicts those beliefs. This can lead them to focus on evidence that supports the idea of their problems being unique.

Historical amnesia. This is a phenomenon where people forget or overlook historical events, making current issues seem more novel than they actually are. The lack of historical context contributes to the belief that their generation’s problems are exceptional.

Survivorship bias. This bias occurs when people focus on successful or surviving examples and ignore those that failed or were lost. When people only see the successful aspects of previous generations, they may perceive their own challenges as unprecedented.

Cultural relativism. This fallacy occurs when individuals view their culture or generation as the norm by which all other cultures or generations should be judged. This can lead to the belief that their problems are unique because they perceive their own values as the standard.

Nostalgia fallacy (Golden Age fallacy). This is the tendency to idealize a specific period in the past, believing that it was a time of perfection or greatness. This fallacy can lead people to perceive their own generation’s problems as unique and worse than those of previous generations.

Presentism. Presentism is the tendency to judge the past based on present-day values and perspectives. This fallacy can make people believe that their challenges are unique because they’re evaluating the past through the lens of their own time.

Misunderstanding complexity. People might oversimplify the problems of previous generations, assuming that they were less complex or severe. This misunderstanding can make their own problems seem more unique or complicated.

Sociocultural trends contribute to generational myopia.

Technological advances. Older generations might perceive younger generations as overly dependent on technology and view their reliance on smartphones and social media as detrimental to interpersonal communication. Younger generations, on the other hand, might believe that these technological tools are essential for staying connected and informed in the modern world. People are comfortable with what they have a habit of using, and that would include the ways of communicating associated with the tools.

Although technology has led to improved productivity and standards of living, there is also evidence that smartphones and social media have negative impacts on communication: reduced face-to-face interaction and decreased non-verbal cues and misinterpretation of emotions, distraction and decrease in attention span, lack eye contact and rapport, and dependency. Problems in communication arising from modern technology may in fact be unique to the younger generations.

Political and social movements: Each generation often experiences its own set of political and social challenges. For instance, older generations who lived through significant historical events like the Civil Rights Movement might feel that younger generations don’t fully understand the struggles they faced. Conversely, younger generations might believe that their approach to addressing issues like climate change or gender equality is more progressive.

One explanation for this phenomenon is the concept of social recurrence, which suggests that certain fundamental social issues, conflicts, and challenges are recurring patterns in human history. Several sociological factors contribute to this perception. Human nature is essentially unchanged. Basic needs and conflicts for food, shelter and recognition have been basic needs at all times and places. Cultural norms may evolve, but the substrate in human needs and motivations is the same. Thus, racism, sexual discrimination, class struggle — are old problems with new names.

Workplace dynamics. Older generations might perceive younger employees as lacking work ethic and discipline due to their emphasis on work-life balance. Younger generations might argue that they prioritize efficiency and results over traditional notions of “putting in hours.”

Simon Sinek, a motivational speaker and author, has expressed his observations and opinions on the work attitudes and behaviors of millennials in the workplace. One of his well-known discussions on this topic is his video titled The Millennial Question, which garnered significant attention on social media. In the video, Sinek highlights several points about millennials and their approach to work. These problems may be unique to the “millenial” generation. They also illustrate some of the points brought out above:

Instant gratification. Sinek suggests that millennials have grown up in a world of instant gratification due to technology and the internet. This can lead to a desire for quick results and can sometimes clash with the patience and persistence required in a professional setting.

Impatience with career progression. He notes that millennials often have high expectations for rapid career advancement and can become frustrated if they don’t see immediate results. Sinek attributes this attitude to a combination of factors, including the instant gratification culture and the influence of social media where success stories seem instantaneous.

Lack of patience in work. Sinek points out that the willingness to stay in a job for an extended period, putting in the effort to learn and grow, is essential for professional success. He suggests that millennials’ tendency to change jobs frequently could be influenced by their desire for quick advancement.

Seeking purposeful work. Sinek highlights millennials’ inclination to seek meaning and purpose in their work. He suggests that millennials value jobs that have a positive impact on society and provide a sense of purpose more than previous generations. They also have more kinds of jobs to choose from that can fulfill a wide variety of purposes, compared to the fewer options their parents had.

Communication challenges. Sinek mentions that heavy use of digital communication might have affected millennials’ ability to engage in meaningful face-to-face interactions and build strong interpersonal skills, which are essential for teamwork and leadership.

Balancing technology and real-life experiences. Sinek discusses how millennials’ constant engagement with technology, particularly social media, could contribute to feelings of loneliness, lack of self-esteem, and decreased satisfaction with life.

Sinek’s views on millennials have generated both agreement and criticism. Some praise him for shedding light on potential challenges and offering insights into generational dynamics, while others argue that his observations oversimplify the diverse experiences and motivations of millennials.

Here are some ways to manage the Law of Generational Myopia. Many of these can be implemented in the workplace, at universities, and in churches.

1. Encourage open conversations between different generations. Create a space where people can share their experiences and perspectives to foster understanding and empathy.
2. Establish mentorship programs where individuals from different generations can learn from each other. This can help break down stereotypes and bridge the generation gap.
3. Teach history and geography and share stories from different eras to help each generation understand the challenges and accomplishments of the past. This can lead to a greater appreciation for the lessons that history can offer.
4. Encourage cross-generational collaboration on projects. Working together on tasks can help individuals recognize each other’s strengths and contributions.
5. Highlight common values and goals that span generations. Emphasizing these shared aspects can help minimize misunderstandings and conflicts.
6. Implement training that focuses on understanding different generational perspectives. This can help create a more inclusive and harmonious environment.
7. Encourage a balance between innovation and tradition. Recognize the value of both new ideas and the wisdom of experience.

The Law of Generational Myopia reminds us to be mindful of our tendency to dismiss the experiences of other generations. By fostering understanding and collaboration, we can benefit from the collective wisdom of all age groups.

Next up, the Law of Death Denial.

(Q.C. 230827)