Action is the teacher and guide and all that makes things right. Once we start thinking we usually tend to overthink, but it’s more than that. Buddhism provides an interesting insight as to the point where we overthink. In Buddhism, when we try to be honest we cease to be honest; brave cease to be brave; diligent, diligent.
That is, in certain things there is no need to rationalize or explain. Every time we have to explain, we are likely to be telling a lie anyway. We may be required to explain our actions sometimes. Buddhism says that the attitude to take is that the action we took is part of the natural course of events. Meaning, there is a natural response to a situation, a natural solution to a problem, a natural decision to a matter at hand. There is objective morality in the situation itself, without at the same time being casuistic about it. The situation is defined by Aristotelian moral components: the matter, the intention, and the circumstances, and there is no faster way to think through that besides intuition. I intuit the expedient then go. Simple as that.
Thus, the best explanation for a decision is to describe how you envisaged the event to develop. This requires data. It also requires estimating where the decision is within this continuum we call the EVENT.
The I Ching is another case in point: it provides one with randomly generated models. That is to say, all models are valid! But, choosing an oracle means choosing the path an event will develop. And here’s the great beauty of it: each oracle describes a “logical” or natural sequence. Once an oracle is chosen, one also chooses the natural sequence. Since there is no concept of time, one can think of looking forward (prediction) or backward (analysis) or at the here and now (perspective). The point that I find most interesting about the I Ching’s oracles is that there is not fixed “objective” nature to an event. Rather, the event is conditioned by how we look at it plus the matter, the intention and the circumstances.
I add a final component to that equation. The two points of view I mentioned about, Aristotelian and Taoist pertain to doing the right thing. There is, however, the point about doing things right. This is more the subject of art, but the equivalent in moral actions I would put under the heading “ritual”. This could be Confucian, custom, legal, administrative procedure.
In short, to think wholly about a situation we have to do both the right thing and the thing right:
- Doing the right thing is to follow
a. Aristotelian moral variables: matter, intention, circumstances
b. Taoist natural sequence: I Ching oracles - Doing the thing right is to follow Ritual: law, custom, protocol.
I said that the fastest way to go through all of that is to intuit the action. Of course, one must use all the science and skills at one’s disposal to synthesize available information etc. But I realize that one must not forget that one can choose any point of departure for the point of view and merely follow the sequence. Hence, the I Ching. I should be using the I Ching more often. I do have a notebook. I should use that to record my decisions. Again, “How to do the right thing and the thing right.”
This, however, is a rather personal kind of ethics. I do not imagine that other people will be comfortable with the I Ching, and I’m not eager to advocate its virtues.
The I Ching to me is not fortune telling. It’s all about setting the starting point. For a modeling exercise.