Perception and Perspective (Part II)

In my last blog I talked about the difference between perception and perspective. I implied that perspective could give one an advantage in life, not just because it provides more useful information upon which to base one’s beliefs and behaviors, but also because it is more rare than the skill of perception.

In this blog I will be more practical. It will address the question: how do I improve my perspective?

Most people walk around living in their own perceptive haze, looking out into the world and taking only the information they can see, feel, hear, taste and touch. In contrast, the one who lives with perspective sees, feels, hears, tastes and touches the world as others do. This gives the person of perspective an information advantage. What is the advantage useful for? The person acting from perspective can predict what other people will do.

If you are a leader, a salesman, or anyone whose job depends upon persuading or influencing others, then to be good at your job you will need to discern what moves people to do what they do. Perspective is what allows you to do that. Perspective is not the same as empathy (understanding what others feel) or sympathy (feeling what others feel), which are judgments you make out of feeling. Perspective considers empathy and sympathy as part of a broader range of observations that also include behavior — actions, speech, what people do and say. If you can discern motivations you are able to pull levers, and that is your influence.

Although there may be no step-by-step program on how to learn this skill, a number of methods from military intelligence may help one to better transition from perception to perspective. Military intelligence is about discerning motives and logistics, and from that, deducing tactics and strategies. Intelligence is interested in accurate assessments, strategic planning, and effective decision-making. You are interested in these as well.

How do you do that?

Integrate data from various sources. Combine observations of what people say and do and under what circumstances. Observe their environment, the interactions they have with others, their favored places, and how they react.

Use a Red Team, i.e., people in your own circle whose job is to challenge your assumptions, facts, sources and reasoning. Members of the Red Team may also simulate emotional reactions. Some of them might act rude, especially when they point out shocking vulnerabilities. But they’re your friends, you get the picture.

Develop cultural intelligence and try to understand the cultural nuances of that influence the perspectives and actions of various actors who are the object of your analysis.

For more complex perspectives, you can engage your circle to visualize scenarios that explore a range of potential outcomes. This allows you to expand your perspectives even more, and devise strategies that are adaptable to diverse situations.

A cultural perspective also aims to understand the social and political dynamics that influence decisions. Religion, family or clan histories, and level of education have great effects on how people perceive grievances and motivations.

Foster collaboration and information-sharing among different people. You will want to have a wide network that will also include people who do not think at all like you. You will be consuming media that represent a spectrum of positions.

It is an advantage to have a grasp of human psychology. You should be able to identify incentives, and to understand how different people perceive information and messaging. This cannot be overstressed: people really differ in the way they PROCESS information, such that given exactly the same data, different people will reach different conclusions. The flip side is that people who belong in the same group tend to think so similarly that their “perspective” more closely resembles group perception, also called groupthink. Knowing these nuances also helps you craft effective communication strategies and counter adversarial narratives.

Learn ethics and incorporate that in your decision and action plans. Ethical actions are also considerate actions even as they try to be as objective as possible. Emotions can be formidable barriers to proper decision making, so much so that surgeons often refuse to operate on their relatives.

Always be learning. Update yourself about evolving political, geographical, cultural, and economic landscapes. Stay informed about technology. Be cautious also about how technology, e.g., social media, affects the way people think and how they see themselves and others. Consider how ideas can become fixed in the minds of people who are especially living in perceptive haze, i.e., those who refuse to see the world in any other way than their own.

Learn also to incorporate risk analysis in your thinking. People who are excited about their findings are the most blind to the potential difficulties and weak points, and so risk analysis is an important part of scenario planning. Note that risks often come from subjective fears and anxieties. In other words, we cannot assume that people will always act rationally. The beauty here is that people’s biases tend to fall within a few classes of cognitive errors. Daniel Kahneman describes these cognitive biases in his popular book Thinking, Fast and Slow.

“Our comforting conviction that the world makes sense rests on a secure foundation: our almost unlimited ability to ignore our ignorance.”

Daniel Kahneman (1934- )

The ability to transcend basic perception and gain a deeper understanding of perspectives is essential for accurate risk assessments, effective planning, and successful operations. These strategies ensure that you can navigate complex and dynamic social landscapes with a nuanced understanding of diverse perspectives.

(Q.C., 231202)

Perception and Perspective (Part I)

Last weekend, I had lunch with a group of military officers and their aides. Across the table from me sat a Major from the special forces and a Colonel formerly from intelligence. At one point, I asked them whether it was true that in battle, a soldier is not really that nervous, and that the knees shake afterwards.

“Not true,” they said. “One is nervous and anxious especially before an encounter. When the enemy fires first, we are stunned — we hang — for about 5 seconds. But the moment we return fire, anxiety disappears, and it’s back to doing our job. The real manoeuvres actually happen after the first shots are fired.”

“And,” they added, “victory often belongs to the one who fires first.”

I refer to this little exchange to introduce an important skill: knowing the difference between perception and perspective. Put that way, before an encounter, the soldier perceives the battlefield to be a dangerous place where he must kill or be killed. After he returns fire, he sees the battlefield as an area for manoeuvering, for positioning himself to best hit the enemy.

Andrew Bustamante, inspirational speaker and former CIA agent, was asked what is the top professional skill to learn, and he said immediately that it was this one.

Recognizing the subtle differences between them is vital for fostering effective communication, empathetic connections, and a more nuanced grasp of reality. This impacts the way we respond to facts and feelings, and therefore, may have implications in personal development and well being.

Perception is the process by which we answer “What does this sensory information mean to me?” How does the world make sense to me as a result? Perception is “to live like the star on one’s own movie.” It is our natural way of being, the default option. Perception is susceptible to biases, cultural influences, and individual experiences.

Perspective is the ability to perceive oneself from another’s position. It is to “watch your life according to another’s point of view.” The soldier no longer thinks, “He’s trying to kill me“, but rather “Where is he shooting me from and why from there?” In contrast to perception, it is not as natural and may require some training.

So now I get it. In the first 5 seconds after being shot at, a soldier perceives the enemy is trying to kill him. Perhaps those few seconds are filled with self doubt, fear, anger. All coming together, the man is stunned — perfectly natural. A soldier experiencing this for the first time, or who may have underlying psychological or emotional issues could hang for much longer than 5 seconds. A trained soldier would still experience these reactions. But returning fire overcomes these reactions. From this point, he sees how the enemy sees, thinks how the enemy thinks, sees his position the way the enemy sees it, and USES THIS KNOWLEDGE TO HIS ADVANTAGE regardless of any initial thoughts and fears he might have had.

On the other hand, coldness can turn to cold blood, explaining atrocities committed after a victory. The victor perceives the enemy as pure evil to be destroyed, without the perspective of their humanity.

I once advised a student that one of the most dangerous things especially for a sensitive soul is to be alone with his or her thoughts. It appears to me that perspective benefits from being more social, though it may also be accompanied by coldness and calculation even among close friends. Cold and calculating is good even among mates during battle.

Perception and perspective work together. It’s just harder to train perspective.

Understanding the distinction fosters effective communication. For example, you’re told that you’re too fat. You might perceive this in a positive light — you used to be malnourished. Or, you might in a negative light. Other people might just not care.

Is it because they have perspective? Maybe. If people told me I was fat, being a powerlifter, I would consider this advantageous — the heavier you are, the more weight you can lift. Or I’ll take it as a useless comment.

Dissociate my feelings from the facts allows me to use information to my advantage, the same data that would be catastrophic to me without practice.

I admit it is never easy to receive criticism. It is, in fact, a fear I must overcome when submitting articles to journals. When the reviews come, I perceive them to be attacks on my competence. I feel down, angry, why did I enter into this stupid profession? But, within a short while, I see these comments as constructive, and the pain turns to gratitude. I might conclude that the comments are not valid, but on the whole I end up appreciating all of them.

It may be more difficult to read these reviews for a number of reasons. When one has worked A LOT on a project, one naturally gets emotionally attached and thus more resistant to negative comments. When one has received many brutal comments in the past, one anticipates comments as evil and might not even submit the paper. The dread feelings are very real, but being real does not mean they are valid. Many people have quit their careers even before they got started, just because of the fear of failure and criticism.

Another reason for anxiety is when the reviewers are people I know and whom I do not like. Still, the perspective of an enemy is sometimes much more accurate than that of a friend. An enemy has nothing to prove. He is less inclined to sugarcoat his perspective and does not care about hurting your pride or your feelings and .

According to Bustamante, many people live their whole lives perceiving, without taking the trouble to learn perspective. I suspect many anxieties today, from the effect the Israel-Hamas conflict has on ordinary Tik Tokers to the anxieties passport bros inspire in women, are symptoms of a failure of perspective. Karens are ALL PERCEPTION. On the other hand, coldness and calculation can also lead to atrocities — Genghis Khan was notorious for using overwhelming violence as a weapon through sheer force of fear, and it worked. But he also had high level of perception. Perhaps recalling his own defeats and his role in them, he said:

“An action committed in anger is an action doomed to failure.”

Genghis Khan (died 1227)
Genghis Khan, Mongol Emperor (ruled 1206-1227). Image: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.caclubindia.com%2Fwealth%2Fgenghis-khan-net-worth%2F&psig=AOvVaw2IJU3P1hEg35ZkPuxowOv5&ust=1701419982438000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CBIQjhxqFwoTCICQ6Jaq64IDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAJ

It may well be useless to know the distinction between perception and perspective if one has not acquired wisdom especially from the study of history, ethics, and philosophy. It is, of course, just as useless without knowing how to execute.

(Q.C., 231130)